Does it make sense to bring Kamarda back to Milan instead of acquiring Fülkrog?
This topic came up for me after I watched a youth highlights clip late at night and then immediately switched to a Milan match replay. It really hit me how different the conversations are when we talk about young players versus experienced ones. With Camarda, there’s excitement and emotion, almost like watching someone grow up in front of your eyes. With Fullkrug, it feels more practical and short-term. I remember similar debates in the past where fans argued heart versus logic, and sometimes those choices shaped entire seasons. That’s why I’m curious how people see this one.
4 Views
From a practical angle, I don’t think it has to be a strict either-or choice, but I get why the comparison exists. Camarda represents potential and continuity, while Fullkrug is more about immediate structure and experience. When I read https://sempremilan.com/few-goals-lots-of-games-missed-what-questions-does-fullkrug-answer-for-milan, it helped frame why Milan might still look outside instead of relying fully on youth. I’ve seen young talents rushed too quickly at other clubs, and that rarely ends well, so some balance between patience and support from experienced players can really matter.